Radiology at a Tipping Point: Structural Limitations and the AI Solution
Radiology departments worldwide are currently facing a structural crisis. The volume of imaging data required for screening and diagnosis is increasing exponentially every year, yet the workforce of specialists cannot keep pace with this speed. In particular, as national screening programs for lung cancer (LDCT), breast cancer, and colorectal cancer expand, the workload in radiology is reaching a breaking point.
In this environment, burnout is beginning to be recognized not as an individual issue, but as a systemic one. As a solution to this structural problem, AI is establishing itself as a realistic operational alternative, no longer just a "future technology."
As of 2026, we can now look beyond vague expectations and confirm the direction AI should take through specific Clinical Evidence published in 2025.
Beyond "How well does it detect?" to "How efficient is it?"
While past research focused on simple detection performance, recent studies are focusing on "Clinical Workflow Efficiency."
A study based on
UKLS (UK Lung Cancer Screening) data, published in the European Journal of Cancer in 2025, simulated workflow efficiency upon AI adoption. The study demonstrated that the AI software used for analysis (AVIEW) has the potential to improve reading workflow efficiency by up to 79%.
This suggests that technology can assist medical staff by reducing time spent on repetitive tasks, creating an environment where they can focus on high-risk patients.
Workflow Optimization Driven by High Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
As an alternative to reduce the excessive workload in radiology, the academic community is exploring the possibility of Triage (selective reading) using AI.
A data analysis
study of the Italian MILD Trial, published in the European Journal of Radiology in 2025, demonstrates this potential. Researchers conducted simulations based on AVIEW's high Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and confirmed a potential to reduce the total reading workload by approximately 71%.
These results imply that AI can contribute to quickly classifying normal findings and prioritizing cases that require precise reading by medical professionals.
Expert-Level Precision Beyond Speed
As important as efficiency is "Accuracy" and "Reliability."
In a follow-up study using UKLS data, the algorithm (AVIEW) recorded a high Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.94 with expert readings in measuring Nodule Volume Doubling Time (VDT). Additionally, a comparative study with a global competitor showed significantly fewer segmentation errors (5 cases vs. 12 cases), proving its technical robustness.
A Data-Driven Approach to Structural Improvement
These research results illustrate the changes AI-based analysis tools can bring to the structure of radiology work. AI is being discussed not as a technology that replaces clinical judgment, but as infrastructure to support a more efficient diagnostic environment.
Curious if this clinically proven efficiency can be applied to your hospital? Let us review your current reading system together, and we will propose the optimal AI adoption strategy tailored to your hospital's environment.
*Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes based on published research results. The actual clinical application and usage methods may vary depending on the judgment of each medical institution and local regulatory requirements.
List
